Submariner

Just got my eighth Sub and I gotta say, the 41mm case hits different than the 40mm-feels modern and substantial without being a wrist tank. Movement is bulletproof as always, keeps solid time, and the overall finish is clean. Only knock is the price premium for the yellow gold doesn't feel like a home run compared to steel alternatives, but if you're committed to the two-tone Sub life like me, you won't be disappointed.

Yellow gold Submariner is one of those love-it-or-hate-it watches. On the wrist it's substantial - no getting around 150+ grams of solid 18k gold - and it commands attention in a way stainless never will. The 40mm case wears beautifully for me, though the weight takes some getting used to. Champagne-lume markers with black surround give it just enough edge to still feel like a Sub, not a dress watch. The value question is real - you're paying a significant premium over the steel version - but the presence is undeniable. Not for everyone, but I'm a fan.

Beautiful watch and the movement is solid, but man, that price tag is hard to justify when you can get comparable accuracy and reliability from pieces half the cost. Don't get me wrong-it wears fantastic and has that unmistakable Rolex presence-but unless you're really committed to the brand heritage or the resale thing, I'd seriously look at what else is out there in that range first.

The 16610LV is a genuinely solid sub that hits that sweet spot between tool watch practicality and collectible appeal-the movement is bulletproof, it wears beautifully, and you're getting a piece of Rolex history without needing to take out a second mortgage. Yeah, it's not a chronograph so I'm contractually obligated to say there's room for improvement, but honestly? For what this watch does at its price point, it's tough to complain. If you want a Submariner that actually feels special compared to the current lineup, this one checks all the boxes.

The 14060M is the no-nonsense Submariner-solid movement, bulletproof reliability, and that classic tool-watch feel that never gets old. It's expensive for what it is, especially compared to what the microbrand crew is doing these days, but there's something to be said for owning the watch that set the standard. Great everyday piece if you can justify the premium, though honestly I'd probably spend the difference on a Traska and a Formex and have more fun with it.

The 126610LN - the post-2020 transition piece that finally bumped the Sub Date to 41mm and dropped the cal. 3235 in place of the long-serving 3135. I've worn both references back to back for extended periods and the 3235's 70-hour power reserve and improved Chronergy escapement are genuinely felt in daily use, not just spec-sheet bragging. The Oystersteel case finishing is about as close to perfect as production watches get at volume. Maxi dial with the flat-four handset reads beautifully at depth and in low light. My only real gripe - and it's a tired one - is secondary market pricing making the 'value' conversation absurd. The watch is worth what it is, but not what you're paying for it right now. Still the benchmark by which I compare every other dive watch I pick up.

The 124060 is the no-fuss sub that actually makes sense-solid movement, bulletproof case, and it wears smaller than you'd think, which is perfect for constant travel like mine. Yeah, it's pricey and you're basically paying for the name at this point, but if you want a watch that'll outlive you and never embarrass you, it's hard to argue against. Not breaking new ground, but sometimes the classic formula just works.

The 5513 is what a Submariner is supposed to look like - cleaner than the Milsub, less busy than the modern Sub, and with proportions that just work on any wrist. Whether you land on matte or gilt-dial, this is the reference that defines the tool watch. Prices have climbed hard, but few watches deliver this much presence and history for the money.

The 5513 is the archetypal Submariner and there's a reason it endures. On the wrist it disappears - modern Subs feel oversized in comparison. Movement is basic but bulletproof. My honest complaint: prices have gone insane. If you're patient and can find a clean example at last decade's prices, this is a lifetime piece.

The Submariner in its purest form. What use is a diving watch? To measure time underwater. What does it require? A rotating bezel, luminous markers, a robust case. Anything else is decoration; and decoration, unmoored from function, is at best neutral and at worst a lie. The 5513 refuses decoration. In this refusal it becomes admirable.

The Submariner reference 5513. Vintage. Matte dial. This is the correct Submariner - everyone at the office knows that, or ought to. Reese wore a modern Submariner last Tuesday and I noticed immediately; I doubt he did. The 5513 has provenance. It has weight. It has meaning. I am considering acquiring a second.

The Submariner 5512. Crown guards. COSC certification - a small line of text at the six o'clock position that separates men who know what COSC means from men who do not. There is a hierarchy in vintage Submariners; the 5512 sits second only to the 5513, and only for reasons that are, honestly, about scarcity rather than merit.